About Us

Name: Snikks
Location: Walnut Cove, NC
Biography
Name: TerryCSA
Location: Danbury, NC
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Turbulent Times...Troublesome Times

Never before have our freedoms and the Republic been under such constant attack from within. We have allowed our country and its' control to slip into radical socialist hands. And, it was accomplished right under our nose. 

Ther warning signs were there, have been for decades. There were those sounding the warning bell. But we blew them off as tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists. We were too sensible...too resonable to believe that such evil intentions existed within our own government and institutions. How could we have been so wrong? 

Benjamin Franklin warned us. When asked if we now had a monarchy or a republic, Ben replied, "Republic! If you can keep it." 

Now the question isn't "can we keep it?", but "can we restore it?" Our Constitution has been amended and bastardized beyond recognition and far beyond what the founding fathers had intended. Legislation has been written so cryptically that an entire team of lawyers cannot decipher what our legislators don't even bother to read. Thus leaving laws open to interpretation giving judges the leeway to legislate from the bench, in direct violation of the Constitution. Who's writing these bills if our elected officials aren't reading them and even lawyers can't understand them? 

The Obama administration and the 111th Congress have succeeded in passing some of the most massive spending-pork barrel legislation in our history, along with some of the most immoral, freedom grabbing laws ever. And they aren't done yet. 

I'm angry, angrier than I have ever been in my life. I'm watching everything I believed in, everything I worked for, and everything I raised my children/grandchildren to believe in and work for taken away by the stroke of a socialist pen. 

I'm angry that our elected officials are not doing what we elected them to do, what they swore an Oath to do - uphold the Constitution! 

I'm angry that our elected officials are not getting vocal, loud, and aggressive in performing the job we "hired" them to do. If they behaved in the private sector the way they do in the public sector they would be standing in the unemployment line. 

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) says if we are expecting our elected officials to do something to save our country from socialist tyranny we are waiting in futility. He says it is up to the American people. As much as I like Sen. DeMint and appreciate his honesty, his statements add to my anger. 

What in the Sam Hell did we elect these people to do?!!!! Short of an armed rebellion, what are we suppose to do? Our elected officials are not listening to us. They have forgotten we are their employers. They are not acting as we wish them to. We, the American people, do not propose legislation, nor do we get to vote on it. So, just tell me what are we suppose to do? Vote? 2010 elections are a long way away and you can bet your sweet bippy we are going to vote. But, an awful lot of damage can be done to our Constitution, our government, our freedoms, and our election system by then. So, again I ask, what do we do? 

We can attend Tea Parties, protest marches, town hall meetings, waive signs, plaster bumper stickers all over, write our elected officials till our hands fall off, but they are not listening. So what does that leave us with? 

Apparently exercising our 2nd Amendment rights gets their attention. Wearing our sidearms in public creates a furor among the mainstream media and the left. Is that what it takes to get their attention? We should not have to resort to such tactics. Does this lead us to what none of us want to see, but what our founding fathers said must happen in order to save our Republic? 

A lady asked Dr. Franklin Well Doctor what have we got a republic or a monarchy - "A republic," replied the Doctor, "if you can keep it." 

Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined. 
Patrick Henry, speech in the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778 

"... God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty.... And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure." 
Thomas Jefferson

And how does this happen? We cannot count on our military since the Pentagon has been taken over by the left along with George Soros employees. We can't count on the Citizens Militias since they have taken on the cowardly stance of "We are a defensive unit only". We can't count on our republican officials since they have put the responsibility back on their constituency. 

Is there one man or one woman with the power, the conviction, and the kahunas to lead us from these dark days? Without leadership rebellion becomes anarchy. Is that what we have to look forward to, tyranny or anarchy? 

-TerryCSA

The Conservative Activist
http://theconservativeactivist.com

"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people
of good conscience to remain silent." -- Thomas Jefferson





Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

If Obama Was White He Would Be Impeached….

    

But, wait! He is! He is half white, raised by white grandparents, given an Ivy League education any white child would desire, yet people still consider him a black man. Could it be he continues his rhetoric of associating himself with the poor, down trodden black folk? What does he know about living the life of a black man? Absolutely nothing. What he does do is lie, and lie often.

If he was considered a white man people would be rioting in the streets screaming for his impeachment for his treasonous acts, his repetitive violations of the Constitution which he swore an oath to uphold, for his thuggish bullying and corrupt behavior, for selling out the American people.

Obama is taking us on the fast train to hell and people are still drinking the kool aid. “I voted for a black man. I’m not a racist.” Well screw them. Call me a racist. Call me a bigot. Call me a Right Wing Extremist. I don’t vote for a person based on the color of their skin, but on the content of their character. Obama is lacking in character. He is a traitor to our country and to the American people.

It is time people opened their eyes, stopped being ashamed of their own skin, stop feeling vindicated for any misplaced guilt that caused them to vote for a man they knew absolutely nothing about.

Educate yourselves:

Obama's mythography: An Orwellian disaster
 
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_632488.html

President Barack Obama's Orwellian rhetoric has become absolutely pathological. And it's become so blatant that you can almost guarantee that the truth is the exact opposite of what he says. To wit:

The president insisted he had no intention of taking over Chrysler and General Motors.

He did.

The president calls "cap-and-trade" environmental legislation a "market-based" approach, based on "sound science."

It is not.

The president claims his health care reform plan is not "socialized medicine."

It is.

He claims it won't harm private insurance.

It will.

He claims service won't be rationed.

But to control costs as he proposes, it must be. (Even top aides concede the point.)

Mr. Obama says he supports "democracy" in Latin America.

How can he? He also supports the Marxist ways of Manuel Zelaya, legally removed from Honduras' presidency by the constitutional actions of the legislative and judicial branches.

And the examples of this president's mythography go on and on.

Some will dismiss Barack Obama's pronouncements merely as "rhetoric" and "posturing." "Everybody does it," they'll say. "It's politics."

But this is different and decidedly more dangerous: The president of the United States says one thing and does another and claims things that cannot possibly be.

Whether by delusion or by design, Barack Obama is being dishonest with the American people. And that is a harbinger of national disaster.

PROMISES, PROMISES: Obama tax pledge unrealistic

 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090708/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_tax_promise

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER, Associated Press Writer – Wed Jul 8, 6:16 pm ET

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama promised to fix health care and trim the federal budget deficit, all without raising taxes on anyone but the wealthiest Americans. It's a promise he's already broken and will likely have to break again. Obama and the Democratic-controlled Congress have already increased tobacco taxes — which disproportionately hit the poor — to pay for extending health coverage to 4 million children in working low-income families.

Now, lawmakers are looking for more revenues to help pay for providing medical insurance to millions more who lack it at a projected cost of $1 trillion over the next decade.

The floated proposals include increasing taxes on alcohol, which could raise $62 billion over the next decade, and a new tax on sugary drinks such as soda, which could raise $52 billion.

Like cigarettes if you don’t partake of a beer or a glass of wine or a glass of soda this tax won’t effect you. But I think most of us do partake of at least one of these beverages. Just remember the next time you drink a glass of soda that Obama lied to you. And you are being taxed.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said negotiators are still looking for revenue alternatives. Asked during an interview with The Associated Press if they included tax increases on families with incomes less than $250,000 a year, Schumer said, "There are lots of things on the table now."

"We're all going to have to contribute," said Eugene Steuerle, a former treasury official in the Reagan administration and now vice president of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation.

What happened to “No taxes on those making less than $250,000?

"Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes," Obama told a crowd in Dover, N.H., last year.

 The federal budget deficit is projected to hit an unprecedented $1.8 trillion this year — on top of a national debt that has already topped $11 trillion. Obama insists that any bill on health care or climate change not add to the debt.

Obama says much of the $1 trillion needed for his health care overhaul will come from cutting costs. So far, drug companies and hospitals have agreed to provide 10-year savings of $235 billion.

Health care experts say cost cutting alone won't produce enough money to insure the nearly 50 million Americans who lack coverage. Moreover, Congress is obligated to follow budget rules that might not recognize many of the promised savings.

I think we can all figure out that the remaining $765 billion is going to come out of our pockets. But remember he said…

"Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes," Obama told a crowd in Dover, N.H., last year.

"The administration has an extremely difficult educational problem on its hands," said Henry J. Aaron, a health care expert at the Brookings Institution. "They understand that at some point tax increase are going to be necessary across the board.

"Yes, for the middle class, too," he added.

Obama made a firm tax pledge during the presidential campaign, repeating it numerous times in the weeks and months leading up to Election Day: no tax increases for individuals making less than $200,000 a year or couples making less than $250,000.

"Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes," Obama told a crowd in Dover, N.H., last year.

But less than a month after taking office, Obama signed an expansion of child health care financed by 62-cent tax increase on each pack of cigarettes.

Obama also signed an anti-smoking bill in June that grants authority to the Food and Drug Administration to regulate tobacco. To pay for the new program, a fee is being imposed on the industry — and presumably passed on to consumers — estimated to generate more than $5 billion over the next decade.

And where do you honestly think this is going to come from? Why, of course, the taxpayers, including those making less than $250k yr.

"Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes," Obama told a crowd in Dover, N.H., last year.

While not directly increasing taxes, a House-passed version of Obama's plan to reduce greenhouse gases blamed for causing global warming would similarly increase American families' home energy bills.

On average every family will pay an additional $2,600 per year in utility bills. That is a tax folks! Dress it up, take it out, it is still going to hurt millions of families making less than $250k yr. Yep, that’s you and me.

"Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes," Obama told a crowd in Dover, N.H., last year.

The appeal of Baucus's proposed tax on health benefits was the amount of money it could raise. Currently, employer-provided health benefits are not taxed, regardless of how generous they are.

One version of it would tax health benefits that exceed the value of the basic insurance plan offered to federal workers, raising about $420 billion over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation. But limiting it to individuals making more than $100,000 a year and couples making more than $200,000 would raise only $162 billion.

The math illustrates how difficult it is to raise enough money to pay for expensive programs, when tax increases are limited to the wealthy.

Which means they will have to tax everyone (that includes you) to pay for their hairbrained ideas for socialized medicine which people don’t want.

"We're living in an era, over a period of 20 years or more, in which the idea that tax rates would actually be boosted is unutterable," said Aaron, the health care expert. "That has to stop."

Savior or Saboteur? Obama in a Realistic Light

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12716

 By Joe Crews and Harvey Wysong 

It is a great pity when the one who should be the head figure is a mere figure head.”

-- Charles H. Spurgeon

Barack Obama is less of a person than an image— a brand. People see whatever they want as they do on a Rorschach test. But does anyone really know him?

In fact, he is:

  • An empty suit.
  • A man with no birth certificate.
  • A man who was deserted in childhood by his biological father.
  • A man whose birth records, both in the United States and Kenya, are sealed by government order.
  • A man whose childhood mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, spied on U.S. military installations in Hawaii for the Soviet Union, edited a communist newspaper, authored pornographic novels, and wrote poetry in praise of Joseph Stalin.
  • A man mentored by and still supported by radical Muslims.
  • A man who promised transparency in government, but has spent over a million dollars in legal fees hiding information that would determine his eligibility to be President.
  • A former drug user.
  • A man whose academic records are sealed from kindergarten through law school.
  • A man who arrived in New York in June of 1981 without enough money to get a hotel room, but one month later flew to Indonesia and Pakistan.
  • Why did he go?
  • Who paid his expenses?
  • A man who traveled to Pakistan when it was illegal for U.S. citizens to do so. So what country’s passport did he use?
  • A man whose Law School Admission Test scores and grades at Columbia University are known to have been mediocre, but was admitted to Harvard Law School through the intervention of a Saudi named Khalid al-Mansour.
  • A law review editor who never published an article in any law review.
  • A lawyer with no significant accomplishments in the law and no reputation in the legal community.
  • A former State and U.S. Senator, who never authored a piece of legislation.
  • A disciple of the Marxist Saul Alinsky.
  • A product of the Chicago political machine—the most corrupt political organization in America.
  • A man who selects Marxists, corrupt politicians, and criminals as his close political associates and personal friends.
  • A man whose presidential candidacy was endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America, the Socialist International, and the Workers International League.
  • A man lauded for the literary brilliance of two memoirs, both of which were ghostwritten by others.
  • A so-called Christian who says that knowing when human life begins is “above his pay-grade,” but somehow knows that abortion is permissible at any stage.
  • A man who thinks “waterboarding” is immoral, but that partial-birth abortion is moral.
  • A man who publicly laments slavery in America—which was abolished 150 years ago—but praises Islam, which still practices both slavery and the sexual mutilation of young girls.
  • A man who speaks endlessly about helping the less fortunate, but gives almost none of his sizeable income to charity—not even to his half-brother, who is living in squalor in Kenya.
  • A man who had the most left-wing voting record in the United State Senate, but was predicted by the press to “govern from the middle.”
  • A man who has never created a job, met a payroll, or even operated a lemonade stand, but wants to tell Detroit how to make cars.
  • A President who has never before served as an executive in either the private or the public sector.
  • A Commander-in-Chief who doesn’t know how to shoot a rifle, throw a hand-grenade, drive a tank, fly a plane, or con a ship.
  • A Commander-in-Chief who has publicly divulged some of our nation’s most important intelligence secrets.
  • A man who has been put in charge of the largest economic engine that ever existed, but has never invested in the stock market and admits total ignorance of it.
  • A President who says that science will guide his administration, but has no education in the sciences.
  • A man who is proficient in reading what is written for him on a teleprompter, but jerks and stammers his way through any off-the-cuff speaking.
  • A man whose health records are sealed from childhood to the present day.
  • A man whose educational records are sealed from childhood through law school.
  • A man who spent 20 years in a church whose pastor espouses Marxist Liberation Theology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Semitism, but claims he never heard his pastor utter anti-American, and anti-Semitic statements.
  • A man who added more to the National Debt in 100 days than all other Presidents did in the past 220 years, yet feels qualified to lecture Americans about “fiscal responsibility”.
  • A man who publicly expressed disdain for the U.S. Constitution on a Chicago radio station because it limited the government’s ability to “redistribute wealth.”
  • The first American President to bow before a foreign head of state—a Muslim dictator.
  • A man who sits and listens submissively while his country is castigated by Daniel Ortega—a Communist thug whose own daughter accused him of raping her.
  • A narcissist who gave the Queen of England a present from the United States --an iPod containing recordings of his own speeches.
  • A so-called Christian who officially declared “Pride Month” for a lifestyle that the Bible calls an abomination.
  • A man who wanted Americans to ignore his Muslim name during his election campaign, yet boasts of his Muslim name when he travels to Muslim countries.
  • A man who can name hundreds of America’s shortcomings, yet none of its great accomplishments.
  • A President who claims the moral high ground by closing Gitmo yet supports the transfer of terror suspects to countries where horrific torture is certain.
  • A President who scoffed at being called a socialist yet acted to nationalize the auto industry, the banking industry, and the insurance industry . . . and now seeks to nationalize the healthcare industry.
  • A President who violates private property rights, the sanctity of contracts, and the rule of law—three essential principles that go back over a thousand years in the Common Law tradition.
  • A man who promised 95% of all Americans a tax cut, but is increasing taxes on 100% of the population through inflation—the cruelest tax of all.
  • A lawyer who represented ACORN—an organization now indicted in several states for voter fraud—whose stated goal is to get as many people on welfare as possible in order to destroy our financial system.
  • A President who cheated GM’s bondholders by giving their property to the UAW in a political payoff.
  • An American President who frequently criticizes his own country when speaking in foreign countries, but never praises America’s generosity, goodness or greatness.
  • A President whose Secretary of the Treasury cheated on his taxes—as did several other appointees and advisors.
  • A President who, despite the current federal debt of 100 trillion dollars, wants to add the greatest debt ever by nationalizing healthcare.
  • A President who scoffs at being called a socialist, yet has appointed 28 “Czars” to circumvent constitutional government, including:
  • A “Science Czar” who has advocated compulsory abortions for American women and the “surrender of sovereignty” to a “comprehensive Planetary Regime.”
  • A self-professed communist as his “Green Jobs Czar”.
  • A “Pay Czar” to regulate the pay of corporate executives.
  • A President who swore an oath to “preserve, protect and defend the constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic,” yet has nominated a domestic enemy of the Constitution to the Supreme Court.
  • A President whose Homeland Security Chief classified pro-lifers, veterans, and supporters of traditional marriage as terrorists.
  • A President who stood silent while the Iranian government hacked unarmed protestors to death with axes, because it was an internal matter, but freely offers his opinions about the internal affairs of Israel and Honduras.
  • A President who decreed that true acts of terrorism must now be described as “man-made disasters.”
  • A President who cracks hurtful jokes about Special Olympians.
  • A President who refused to intercept or inspect a North Korean ship virtually certain to be carrying Weapons of Mass Destruction toBurma.
  • A President who wants to cancel all missile defenses while rogue nations are developing long-range ballistic missiles.
  • An American President who blames the violence in Mexico on America.
  • A Commander in Chief who claims to have been unaware that Air Force One was taken on a terrifying, low-level photo-op over Manhattan.
  • A President who berates American CEO’s for flying in private planes at private expense on company business, but whose wife spends hundreds of thousands tax payer dollars flying to Paris for a shopping spree.
  • A President who promised a transparent administration, but requires all questions be screened before “impromptu” appearances.
  • A man who freely admitted that his energy policies are designed to bankrupt the American coal industry.
  • A President who has presided over the loss of 14.7 million jobs and whose “energy policy” will cause the loss of another 1 million jobs.
  • A President whose “energy policy” will increase the average American’s utility bills by over $2,000 a year in the middle of the Great Recession.
  • A man about whom liberal journalist Tom Brokaw said, “There’s a lot about him we don’t know.” . . .just one week before the election.

The vast majority of Americans do not know who he is, but someone surely does. Someone paid for his travel expenses to Pakistan and Indonesia. Someone engineered legal challenges to all of his election opponents for the State Senate and had them disqualified. Someone straightened and leveled his path to the U.S. Senate when a Democrat Judge made public the child custody records of his Republican opponent. When he was a candidate for the U.S. Senate, someone arranged for him to speak at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. Someone saw to it that all of his records were sealed, both at home and abroad. Someone assembled the massive organization for his run for the Presidency. Someone knows all about him.

Who?

Obama Committing Fraud and Treason: Multiple Grand Juries (Part I)

Source: Pravda.Ru            by Neil B. Turner

What everyone knows:

Most of America knows (beyond any reasonable doubt) that Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama) is not Constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President of the United States (POTUS) and Commander in Chief (CinC) (per Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution of the U.S.).        

                       

Most of America also knows (beyond any reasonable doubt) that the members of Congress (all 535 of them), the Federal Courts, the Supreme Court, and ALL the Media (including FNC) are either ‘in the tank for’ or ‘paid off or intimidated by’ the illegitimate, criminal and Treasonous presumed President and Commander in Chief, Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama) and his coterie of thugs.

Origins, history, and applicability of the citizen’s Grand Jury:

The 5th Amendment of our U.S. Constitution provides that: … ‘No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury.’ It doesn’t say ‘Federal’ Grand Jury, a ‘Grand Jury called and impaneled by a Judge, Special Prosecutor, or District Attorney’, nor does it say a ‘Government impaneled’ Grand Jury.

The concept of a Citizen’s Grand Jury dates all the way back to the Magna Carta in 1215, and was included by the founders in our Constitution and Bill of Rights as a means for the people to reign-in an elected government run amok. It goes without saying that when a government is committing criminal and un-Constitutional acts, it can hardly be relied upon to bring charges and indictments against itself. Justice Antonin Scalia, in a 1992 ruling stated:

"Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history, … the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right.."

"In fact, the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people."

Thus is the situation that we Americans find ourselves in now – the proverbial ‘fox’ is in charge of the ‘henhouse’, and it is devouring the rooster, the hens, the chickens, and their eggs – on a daily basis!

Well if you have taken the time to read this then maybe, just maybe, you have opened your eyes just a little. Put down that glass of kool aid and realize we are in deep crap here people.

 Obama is not Ghandi reincarnate. He is a lying, treasonous, traitorous piece of excrement. It is time to WAKE UP!, RISE UP!, and DEMAND that Obama and his cronies in DC tender their resignation or face the same fate as the Honduran Dictator Zelaya.

 TerryCSA

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Squanderer-in-thief spends $24,000 on First Lurch date

 

Six million people have lost their jobs. We are all feeling this crisis. All except the Obamas. Why? Well they have OUR money to entertain themselves on.

A few martinis and a fine dinner at a swanky restaurant. A broadway play. A normal night out for many New Yorkers and tourists. But not for the Commander-in-Thief Obama and his lurch of a first lady (ahem). Their "date night" comes at the taxpayers expense. Oh, they paid for their own dinner and theatre tickets, but we paid for the fuel and personnel for Air Force One Jr., two helicopters, accompanied by fighter jets, plus two additional planes to carry staff and reporters. What? There aren't any reporters in NY? The cost of the presendential mini plane and two helicopters were reported at $24,000. That doesn't include all the additional costs involved - Security, personal secretaries, NY Police Officers, etc. All paid for by the rest of us hard working Americans.

This is about as irresponsible as it gets. What happened to "We all have to have skin in the game?". Guess that doesn't apply to the welfare recipients now occupying the White House. Unemployment rates rising to Carter-era levels, people losing their homes, fuel prices increasing .19 per gallon over just the past two weeks, tens of thousands of auto related employees losing their jobs on top of the six million already unemployed. A responsible leader would have not shown such careless disregard and disrespect for the American people. At the very least Obmunutz should foot the entire bill for this excursion. Afterall, it was his promise to the First Lurch, not ours.

It just goes to show when you grow up with entitlements and sucking off the government tit, no matter how successful you are, you will still leech off the very people that have given you the opportunity to rise to a position of status.

The $24,000 these White House welfare recipients squandered would have paid the salary of one of those six million people for a year and provided their family with food and shelter.

I just bet this was the "hope and change" that the voters were thinking when they elected this thieving fraud, don't you?

"The White House declined to say how much the trip was costing taxpayers."

Imagine that!
 
-TerryCSA
 
 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Message to our Federal Government - First, Fix the Problems you've created!

 
Cancel the 2010 Census - We can't afford it.

FIND the 10% waste in Medicare and STOP IT - We can't afford the waste.

Halt the hiring of 800 IRS Agents - We can't afford them.

No more Air Force 1 Photo Trips - we can't afford it.

Immediate hiring freeze for ALL federal depts. until the budget is balanced (except for Judiciary, Military, CIA, FBI, Border Agents, Homeland Security) - we can't afford to support all any more people.

Cut every department's budget by 10% plus cut all personnel by 10% (except Judiciary, Military, CIA, FBI, Border Agents, Homeland Security) - we can't afford them.

Cut all money going to the UN by 30% until after we balance our budget - we can't afford more.

Cut all monetary foreign aid to every country immediately...the only foreign aid that will be supplied is Military help, food, medical supplies, tractors, seed, farming equipment - we can't afford it.

By June 2010 (right before the 2010 election) eliminate the Federal Government's retirement program, all federal pension funds will be rolled into the Social Security Program. All federal employees will pay for Social Security and be on Social Security from now on - We can't afford a better program for you than what you give us.

No more Government bonuses (except for Military signing bonuses) until after the budget is balanced - We can't afford it.

All Senators, House Members & their staff and especially the Speaker of the House - Taxpayers will only pay for two trips for you and any of your family members back to your home state per quarter. The trips will be on commercial transportation. We can't afford more than 8 trips per year for you & any of your family.

All federal government (excluding military) will have their health care program eliminated when the Government health care program is passed in the House & Senate- ALL federal employees will then be on that health care program....we can't afford to buy you a better health care plan than what you're giving us!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Supreme Court nominee is a declaration of WAR


Rush Limbaugh, Ken Blackwell and the National Rifle Association all agree - Obama's Supreme Court nominee is a declaration of WAR on the gun owners of America. This is the most egregious attack on our liberties yet. And it must be defeated.

Please relay this email on to all of your contacts, as we have. Everyone must participate in this fight.

Contact information for Ohio's two U.S. Senators is at http://www.mcfan.org/ussenators.aspx . A personal visit to their office is the most powerful statement you can make. The second most influential contact is a personal "snail mail" letter (but you need to get it out quick!). The third most effective is a telephone call. Emails and faxes are also effective. Use one, then another, then another until we are assured by both Ohio's Senators that Obama's choice of the anti-gun nominee is "Dead On Arrival".

Absolutely do not allow her to become a member of the Supreme Court so that she can uphold her own appealed ruling denying your rights to own a gun.

Following is further information about this issue:

http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/InTheNews.aspx?ID=12524

http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/05/26/blackwell_ken_obama_sotomayor/

Reply to all of this follows:

I went on the Internet and searched for everything I could find on the social and political climate in countries immediately before revolution. We appear to be there. Government debt and attempts to disarm citizens are the leading causes. As governments coffers go dry, taxes are raised. As taxes are raised, citizens make it known to those that govern that they are not happy. When government begins to fear the wrath of the people they begin to fear for their own lives. Government believes they have no choice but to disarm the people for their own protection and survival. History has proven that this situation always causes revolution.

I don’t know of any remedy for this. We are writing and calling and faxing our leaders to tell them of our discontent. We are having Tea Parties all over the country. We are still being ignored. None of the issues of the people are being addressed by government. Their answer is to do a study on Americans and decide anyone who does not agree with government policies is a terrorist and a danger to government. Actually, it’s the other way around. Renegade government that treats citizens as if they were owned and can be compelled to do everything government mandates is an insult to people who have been educated to believe they live in a free country with government instituted by the people to serve them. The attempt to disarm the people will fail. It is the most irresponsible action government can attempt.

If government is so ignorant as to avoid what history has taught, they are doomed to repeat it. Americans will never surrender the one mechanism they have to remain free. They will fight to the death to stay armed. It’s nothing short of folly for this government to think Americans will be willing to surrender their guns because a treaty with a foreign power was signed, or the majority of politicians are personally against firearm ownership and therefore Americans must be disarmed.

Consider this as notice. We don’t care what Washington D.C. says. We don’t care what the courts say. We don’t care what the U.N. wants. We will replace government before we surrender our guns.

Mr.and Mrs. Politician, read the Original Organic Constitution for the United States of America. The one that stood for the Republic, not the one you use that stands for your converted corrupt Democracy. The Republic belongs to the people. We will not lose freedom through edicts under your emergency rule. You can have your created democracy. You can function under your own fraud. Just don’t expect us to obey. We have been good and honorable citizens and continued to serve the Republic even as you were dismantling it. The Organic Constitution may be ignored by you, but to us, the people, it is alive and intact. We will not accept corruption of the Bill of Rights. If you attempt to make them null and void under color of law you do so at your own peril. The people have spoken and we are resolute. There is no compromise.

The people have been lied to, abused, made bankrupt, all their property and labor taken for use by you, an irresponsible criminal government. We are no longer stupid. We now know the truth of what has been done. Knowing this we have not come for you.

We are telling you now!!

End the corruption. Rescind Emergency Rule. Give the Republic back to the people. We are involved in an imperfect war declared by you against us. A declaration of war by government against its own citizens is TREASON.

Any attempt to disarm us will signal us to make your imperfect war against us perfect. The people have drawn their line in the sand. You have been placed on notice. Ignore this at your own peril.

http://www.teamgrassfire.com/

http://www.resistnet.com/

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why are Liberals such angry, vile people?

As liberals go around touting "We Won!", they act more like sore losers. The anger in their vile rhetoric directed towards conservatives is somewhat mystifying.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Now they can no longer play the victim of morality, since morality no longer exists.

I have been pondering their anger for some time now and it is starting to make sense... maybe. They are unruly teenagers who act out because they expect discipline. Now just think about this and follow along.

An unruly teenager breaks the rules when he knows there are consequences for his actions. He stays out past curfew, skips school, etc. He knows if he is caught, which he hopes he will be, that he will be punished. He expects to be punished. He needs to be punished. It is his way of reassuring himself that his parents care about what he does and his personal well-being. He knows someone cares about him. If he is not punished then he continues escalating his unruly behavior until someone cares enough about him to stop him. This fulfills a dual need. The need to feel love and the need to play the victim. He can play the victim in front of his peers because he was punished for bad behavior. Since his peers are like minded they can commiserate with him. Thus he gets a false sense of acceptance. In essence his bad behavior is awarded with unconditional love, acceptance, and victimization.

This scenario explains the Garofalo's of the world who spew vile hatred. There is nobody who cares enough about her to punish her. So her anger continues and the consequences of her actions are elusive. She receives acceptance from her peers but, she needs to be the victim. And without consequences and punishment she cannot fulfill the need for unconditional love nor can she play that one role she craves - victim. So her anger grows and her vile spews forth. 

Maybe they are angry because they "won". They know they have bad judgement and the safety net of someone stopping them from hurting themselves suddenly developed a large hole. Now they have no one to blame but themselves for what they have done. Yet their anger is deflected onto conservatives for not stopping them. They didn't really want to win. They wanted to be the victim and to blame the "racists" for their loss. They can't. They won.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Now they feel ashamed, humiliated. "Why isn't everyone coming to my party?" It's like the child that so wants to be liked by everybody, yet nobody shows up for her birthday party. And it's all Bush's fault. She is angry and lashes out at everyone around her because not everybody wants to be her friend. The libs are lashing out at the conservatives because we won't celebrate their victory. They don't understand this isn't the Academy Awards and Obozo isn't Denzel Washington.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Slowly their blinders are being removed and they see what a horrible mistake they made. They were duped and they are scared. Scared because they are responsible. Responsibility is not what liberals want. They don't understand the concept and can't handle it. Now they have to find someone to blame to deflect the blame from themselves.

It's Bush's fault.
It's Rush Limbaugh's fault.
It's the "racist" conservatives fault.
It's everybodies fault but their own.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Now they have nothing to protest. The conservatives are having "Tea Party's" and since it wasn't their idea they are not going to attend. The libs want to be the center of attention and we have stolen their thunder. They never expected us to take to the streets and upstage them. And once again we show them how childish and immature they are. We don't have need to smash windows, scream vulgarities at our opponents, or assault little old ladies to make our point. We are the adults and they are the children. Our objective doesn't require consequences and punishment. Yet, the liberals don't understand that. Our objective doesn't require unconditional love, acceptance, and victimization. Yet, the liberals do not understand that. It befuddles their mind that anyone would peaceably express their views in order to sway public opinon. That's just not how it is done in their liberal minds. So they must attack.

Their mindset is attack-react. In their mind when they are attacked, they react violently. They expect the same from conservatives. Afterall, we are just uneducated, bible clinging, gun toting, racist goobers who meet in the woods. How difficult should it be to get a reaction from such neanderthal types. It is irrational to them that someone of such low standing could exhibit such control, such poise, such maturity. So they continue with their vile denigration of what they know not.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Because they have underestimated the power that is not theirs - the conservative voice. They have awakened the slumbering giant and they have no defenses against him. The Hounds of Hell (liberals) will be squashed beneath his mighty fist. This is what the liberals want. To be punished so they may go back to playing the victim. The role they cherish so much.

 - TerryCSA

"The majority of those who are loosely identified by the term “liberals” are afraid to let themselves discover that what they advocate is statism. They do not want to accept the full meaning of their goal; they want to keep all the advantages and effects of capitalism, while destroying the cause, and they want to establish statism without its necessary effects. They do not want to know or to admit that they are the champions of dictatorship and slavery". - Ayn Rand

 

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fox's "24" Makes a Left Turn

I have watched "24" faithfully since its inception. What I do not understand is this immediate left turn in its theme. This is a show that most libs wouldn't watch since there is no overt gays or pornography theme to it. So why would the producers sabotage one of their most successful shows?

I thought bringing the talentless, left wing loon Garafalo onto the show was a mistake. Now I am sure of it. They HAD a great cast until then.

I am ashamed that Fox is airing this tripe of the left. They would have been wise to let the show die at the end of last season and let it go down as the success it was.  I understand they are under contract to air it. But, I am not under contract to watch it. I have watched my last episode of "24".

Now I am asking the rest of "24" fans to boycott the show as well. If you are tired of this leftist agenda being crammed down your throat, as I am, then turn the channel. We do have the power to refuse to be sickened by the incessant drivel of the leftists agenda.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Patriotism is now Dmestic Terrorism

 

You are a Right Wing Extremist if:

You believe in the Constitution, specifically the 1st (freedom of speech, freedom of religion) and 2nd Amendments (the right to bear arms),
You believe in God and a Christian nation, family values and morals,
You believe state rights supercede federal government rights,
You believe in the right-to-life,
You believe in lower taxes and smaller government,
You believe marriage should be between a man and a woman,
You believe in immigration control,
You believe in capitalism,
You are one of our brave and honorable military veterans.

If you fall into just one of the above categories you ARE a RIGHT WING EXTREMIST, a DOMESTIC TERRORIST.

The nine page report from the Dept. of Homeland Security states that Jihadist and radical islamic terrorists are not the threat to domestic security, but We The People of The United States of America are the most pressing threat to national security.

Since when did being a Patriot and believing in the Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Declaration of Independence become terrorism?

Since when did believing in God become terrorism?

Since when did family values and morality become terrorism?

Since when did Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness become terrorism?

Since when did hard work, personal responsibility, and personal acheivement become terrorism?

Apparently since January 20, 2009.

This report is the most disturbing indication of what the current administration thinks of the American people. It should be an eye opener for every American. The administration is declaring patriotic Americans "enemy combatants", "domestic terrorist". The same thing they will not call the terrorists the killed over 3,000 people on 9/11/2001. The same thing they will not call the terrorists that attacked the USS Cole, beheaded a U.S. journalist, and decrie the demise of the infidel Americans.

This is absolutely atrocious! This administration has declared us, U.S. citizens, the enemy of the state. Heed the warning. They have shown their hand.

You can download a pdf version of this government produced propaganda against the American people at  www.freedomalliance.org.

I urge each and everyone one of you to contact your elected officials and:
Demand they publicly rebuke this report,
Demand Janet Napolitano be removed from her post,
Demand to know who ordered this report,
Demand to know what qualifiers, facts, and information was used in preparing this report.

You will find contact information for each of your elected officials at:
www.senate.gov
www.house.gov

I urge each and every one of you to inform your family, friends, co-workers, church congregations of the existence of this report.

The price of liberty is eternal vigilance. It is time we protect our liberty and be actively vigilant in what this current administration is doing. We have sat silent for far too long. It is time to let our voices be heard. We will not allow tyranny! Those responsible need to be educated to the fact that they work for us at our behest and we expect them to represent US, not their own self-serving fascist agendas. Our children and grandchildrens futures depend on our actions. This occurred on our watch and we failed to do our duty of eternal vigilance. We can correct this and make sure this never happens again.

MAKE NO CONCESSIONS FOR FREEDOM!

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tea Partys Are A Green Movement

There was a time in this country not so long ago that all Americans spoke out about wasteful government spending, no matter what their political affiliation. What makes now so different?

Remember Big Bush's "No New Taxes" campaign? We knew that was a crock, but it got him elected. And we didn't like his tax increases. Then comes Clinton, more taxes, more social programs, more government. We didn't like that either. Then came Lil' Bush. Wow! More spending and even bigger government topped off with an unfavorable war. Yes, we all complained about it all. Every one of these administrations and it didn't matter whether there was an (R) or a (D) behind their names. Now we have Obama and he has been the quintessential big spender, bigger government in the shortest amount of time, clown in the White House.

It is one thing to slip a little in here and a little in there, but this "in your face" massive porkulus spending has been the straw that broke the camels back. It's scary. It's shocking. It is totally out of control. And it is the attitude with which it has been done.

Our employees in DC have forgotton which side of the checkbook they are on. They have embezzled the company funds to fund their own little party (not a political reference). This "we won"  and "you need to get over it" attitude is not what we expect out of adults. We expect our employees to do the job we pay them for and not steal from us. In the private sector employees who behaved in such a criminal manner would be terminated and quite possible prosecuted for their actions.

These Tea Partys are a verbal warning to our employees - "Your jobs are on the line". And speaking of Tea Partys, the one I attended in Greensboro, NC was actually orgainized by a Democrat. Not that political affiliation matters.

This is a "green" movement and we are ALL in the same boat. The drunken sailors in Washington are wanting to take the "green" out of my wallet and yours, and spend it without so much as consulting the boss (us) first.
 
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The first 3 weeks of deceit, corruption, and lies

 
Some pretty scary facts.

Recap of the first three weeks in office.
 

1.  The American people elected a dubious 'half-black' president with a total of 142 days experience as a U.S. Senator from the most politically corrupt state in America, whose governor was just thrown out of office.  The President's first official act was to close Gitmo and make sure the terrorists civil rights were not violated - although he doesn't know what to do with the terrorists now.

2.  The U.S. Congress rushed to confirm a black Attorney General, Eric Holder, whose law firm we later find out represents seventeen of the Gitmo terrorists.

3.  The CIA Boss, Leon Panetta (another left over hack from the Clinton administration), with absolutely no intelligence experience, has a daughter Linda we find out that is a true radical Marxist activist who supports all the Anti-American regimes in the western hemisphere.

4.  We get the most corrupt lying female in American political history as Secretary of State; bought and paid for.

5.  We got a Tax Cheat for Treasury Secretary who files his own taxes.

6.  A Commerce Secretary nominee who withdrew due to  corruption charges.

7.  A Tax cheat nominee for 'Chief Performance Officer' who withdrew under charges.

8.  A Labor Secretary nominee who withdrew under charges of unethical conduct.

9.  A tax evading Secretary of HHS nominee who withdrew under charges of cheating on his taxes.

10.  He is giving Acorn 4 billion in his stimulus package.

11.  He wants to place extreme leftists in top judicial positions.

12.  A true Socialist Stimulus program using your money to support government and controlling your personal insurance.  Medical services will be limited.

13.  He is playing the FEAR TACTIC game and people still keep applauding him and giving him high approval ratings.

14.  He is deeply ingrained with the ACLU and the secular-progressives.


I hope you understand what these people are all about.

WE ARE TRULY A NATION OF MINDLESS STUPID SHEEP, AND HE IS LEADING US TO THE SLAUGHTER WHETHER IT BE BECAUSE OF CRIMINAL INTENT, HISTORICAL IGNORANCE OR GROSS INCOMPETENCE AND NAIVETY.  HE IS ABOUT TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY AND IT HAS ALREADY BEGUN.
 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We grieve for the loss of your Constitution, common sense, and morality

A Letter from an English Woman

 Now let me get this straight: You hired a man with virtually no experience, and mysterious past who might not even be a natural born citizen to be your president... and who derives all his experience from the seat of all corruption.. Chicago. His first act was try to give a trillion of your dollars to Wall Street crooks with absolutely no accountability and he is still trying mightily.. The people who already got your money were caught trying to buy a jet plane bought outside your country. The parties who have received your money and spent it are already legend. We think that within six months the next monies will be partied out and they will be back for more!

 His nominee for Sec of the Treasury is a tax evader. He was confirmed nevertheless. The next three whom he nominated were all tax evaders. Two of them had to withdraw on the same day. Your President promised that absolutely no lobbyists would be part of his administration. Already three of the biggest lobbyists in the country are on his team. Who fed you Americans a whopping dose of stupid? We grieve for the loss of your Constitution, common sense, and morality. I doubt if the Crown would take you back.

Greta Marley
London SW1

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Do these words still have meaning?

Patriot. Sacrifice. Honor. Constitution. Rights. Freedom. Liberty.
 Do these words hold real meaning anymore?

We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

And for the support of this Declaration, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our Fortunes, & our sacred Honor.

Are these just flowery words of a bygone era? Do they stir anything within you, or are they just phrases you learned about in grade school, written long ago when the world was different and men routinely engaged in hyperbole as a means of expressing themselves?

Does the Declaration of Independence mean anything to you? Is it alive today just as it was in 1776? Or is just another artifact of the Revolutionary era like a musket ball or a rusty belt buckle once warn by someone in the Continental Army?

Does the Constitution hold meaning and import today? We hear and read all the time about the ACLU defending peoples' rights to say what they want thus showing support of the 1st amendment, or defending someone's privacy thus showing support of the 4th amendment. Most of us expect to be treated within the bounds of the law. We expect religious freedom. We expect to be able to meet in groups, large or small, to discuss political issues or any topic we want. We know we are free to send an email, make a phone call, write a letter, or speak personally to our representatives to voice our concerns.

What would you think if our freedom of speech, our rights to meet with others to talk about all kinds of issues, our freedom to worship -- or not -- as we please, or our freedom to contact those who represent us in government were declared illegal?

We repel in horror at the idea of being stoned to death for being a victim of a crime. We repel at the idea that one religion must trump all others; that outright banning of some religions but not others is wrong. We oppose a governing body telling us how to dress or what we may or may not say or when we must pray and to whom.

In other words, we take the Bill of Rights seriously, at least in part and at least some of the time. Some part of us rejects the notion of living under a dictator and respects the rule of law with the people being in charge. But what about everything else in the Constitution? Do you know what it says? Do you care?

Is that the way it's supposed to work? Should we be "cafeteria Constitionalists", picking and choosing those things we like and ignoring all the rest, either out of ignorance or in order to advance an agenda?

No. We must not, and here is the reason why: when we ignore the parts of the Constitution we don't really care about or even disagree with, we open the doors wide to having those portions of the Constitution we hold dear taken from us. It's an all-or-nothing deal. When we give government, through our own silence and inaction, the authority to ignore some of the Constitution, we send a message that any part of the Constitution may be ignored including those parts you take for granted.

Can we reasonably believe that our personal preferences will always be upheld while all the rest of the Supreme Law of the Land may be ignored? Can we be reasonably assured the government will operate as it should and to our benefit if we, as voters, do not keep a check on potential governmental abuses of the Constitution, even if those abuses are not ones we really care about all that much?

Of course not!

Please, dear reader, take a moment to re-read the Declaration of Independence. Let it sink in. Realize the degree to which the British Crown had broken its own laws to the detriment of those living in the original 13 colonies, and, more importantly, realize the degree to which those who signed their names to that document put themselves, their families, their wealth and their property in peril. Read and learn what those who signed the Declaration of Independence lost because they had the courage to demand liberty and freedom -- that same liberty and freedom you take for granted today.
 
 
Thank you bkt of conservativesforum.com for the contribution to CSA
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AN AMERICAN REVOLUTION

A Declaration of the People of the United States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of the Citizens of the United States; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to remove from office those who have systematically violated the Laws of the Land and restore their former Systems of Government. The history of the present United States Federal Government is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

The Federal Government has failed to Incorporate against the Fifty States the entire Bill of Rights and other Natural Rights.

The Federal Government has ceded the sovereignty of the United States and it's rule of law, specifically, the Constitution, to a world authority comprised largely of Nations whose legal doctrines run contrary to those of the United States.

The Federal Government has usurped authority not granted to the Federal Government by the Constitution to engage in unwarranted spending and onerous taxation for the purpose of expanding the size and scope of the Government and increasing its power over the People.

Branches of the Federal Government have illegally ceded authority to another branch of government, and Branches have accepted that authority thus dispensing with the inherent system of checks and balances.

The Federal Government has refused to enforce the Supreme Law of the Land in spite of the overwhelming demands of the Populace to do so.

The Federal Government has failed, on the part of elected officials, to uphold their Sacred Oaths to Preserve, Protect and Defend the Constitution of the United States.

The Federal Government has deliberately and systematically made efforts to devalue the currency of the United States of America against the wishes of the overwhelming majority of the Populace.

The Federal Government has deliberately abrogated treaties with other Sovereign Nations.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Representative Government, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

And as a free people who cherish the rule of law and the Liberty that affords, We the People require the following:

That the Concept of Sovereign Immunity is invalid. The People must be able to hold those who have chosen to serve the People, whether elected or appointed, accountable in a Court of Law.

That no Legislation may be passed without Sponsors citing Article, Section and Clause of the Constitution in order to establish its Constitutional validity.

That all Rights acknowledged in the Bill of Rights and other Rights are immutable and thus cannot be superceded by any Legislation, for we understand that a Right that can be taken away or curtailed is not a Right but a Privilege.

That no Branch of government has the Constitutional authority to cede any of its Powers to either of the other branches for any reason, nor does any Branch have the authority to accept power offered by either of the other two branches..

That all existing Federal Laws be reviewed by the Judiciary for the purpose of repealing all laws which cannot be defended Constitutionally.

That all obligations and tasks defined by the Constitution for the various branches of the Federal Government must be met, and that these obligations specifically enumerated therein comprise the sum total of tasks in which the Federal Government may engage.

That the currency of the United States of America be backed by tangible assets in the way of commodities with intrinsic value, that the system of fiat currency be immediately eliminated, and that only the Treasury, as so ordered and authorized by Congress, mint or print currency for or issue credit on behalf of the United States of America.

We, therefore, the People of the United States of America, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these States, solemnly publish and declare, That these United States are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to those holding office in the Federal Government, and that all political connection between them and the Federal Government, is and ought to be totally dissolved until such time as a Federal Government strictly adhering to the Constitution may be formed; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.
 
Thank you bkt of conservativesforum.com for the contribution to CSA
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Welcome to the United Socialist States of America

Since socialism is the intermediate between capitalism and communism we may as well understand the definition of the terms of what we will be experiencing so we get it right. This way we don't make any faux pax and think we have rights or protections under the law. We soon will no longer have a Constitution or a Bill of Rights. So let's understand where we are going so we don't face the wrath of our totalitarian government.

But first I want to thank all my comrades who sat on their arses watching Dancing With The Stars and drinking their beer instead of getting up off their sorry behinds and taking a few minutes to vote.

I want to thank the former Republican Party for straying from their core conservative values and recruiting moderates and RINOs into the party who thought it more important to reach across the aisle than to stand up for the American people, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, The Declaration of Independence, and freedom. Thank you for sitting up there collecting your paychecks while letting the socialist liberals take over and destroy all that we held dear.

Now comrades let's study the meanings of Socialism - Marxism - Communism

so·cial·ism 
  
Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.
The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.

Socialism

 A theory or system of social reform which contemplates a complete reconstruction of society, with a more just and equitable distribution of property and labor. In popular usage, the term is often employed to indicate any lawless, revolutionary social scheme. See Communism, Fourierism, Saint-Simonianism, forms of socialism.

[Socialism] was first applied in England to Owen's theory of social reconstruction, and in France to those also of St. Simon and Fourier . . . The word, however, is used with a great variety of meaning, . . . even by economists and learned critics. The general tendency is to regard as socialistic any interference undertaken by society on behalf of the poor, . . . radical social reform which disturbs the present system of private property . . . The tendency of the present socialism is more and more to ally itself with the most advanced democracy. --Encyc. Brit.

socialism

An economic system in which the production and distribution of goods are controlled substantially by the government rather than by private enterprise, and in which cooperation rather than competition guides economic activity. There are many varieties of socialism. Some socialists tolerate capitalism, as long as the government maintains the dominant influence over the economy; others insist on an abolition of private enterprise. All communists are socialists, but not all socialists are communists.

Marx·ism 

– the system of economic and political thought developed by Karl Marx, along with Friedrich Engels, esp. the doctrine that the state throughout history has been a device for the exploitation of the masses by a dominant class, that class struggle has been the main agency of historical change, and that the capitalist system, containing from the first the seeds of its own decay, will inevitably, after the period of the dictatorship of the proletariat, be superseded by a socialist order and a classless society.

Marx·ism    

  The political and economic philosophy of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in which the concept of class struggle plays a central role in understanding society's allegedly inevitable development from bourgeois oppression under capitalism to a socialist and ultimately classless society.

marxism

the economic and political theories of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels that hold that human actions and institutions are economically determined and that class struggle is needed to create historical change and that capitalism will ultimately be superseded by communism. 

Marxism

The doctrines of Karl Marx and his associate Friedrich Engels on economics, politics, and society. They include the notion of economic determinism — that political and social structures are determined by the economic conditions of people. Marxism calls for a classless society (see class), where all means of production are commonly owned, a system to be reached as an inevitable result of the struggle between capitalists and workers. (See communism.)

Marxism

The doctrines of Karl Marx and his associate Friedrich Engels on economics, politics, and society. They include the notion of economic determinism — that political and social structures are determined by the economic conditions of people. Marxism calls for a classless society in which all means of production are commonly owned (communism), a system to be reached as an inevitable result of the struggle between the leaders of capitalism and the workers.

com·mu·nism 

1. a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.
2. a system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party.
3.  the principles and practices of the Communist party.

com·mu·nism 

A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members.
 
Communism

A system of government in which
the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.
The Marxist-Leninist version of Communist doctrine that advocates the overthrow of capitalism by the revolution of the proletariat.

Communism

 A scheme of equalizing the social conditions of life; specifically, a scheme which contemplates the abolition of inequalities in the possession of property, as by distributing all wealth equally to all, or by holding all wealth in common for the equal use and advantage of all.

Note: At different times, and in different countries, various schemes pertaining to socialism in government and the conditions of domestic life, as well as in the distribution of wealth, have been called communism.

communism

An economic and social system envisioned by the nineteenth-century German scholar Karl Marx. In theory, under communism, all means of production are owned in common, rather than by individuals. In practice, a single authoritarian party controls both the political and economic systems. In the twentieth century, communism was associated with the economic and political systems of China and the Soviet Union and of the satellites of the Soviet Union.


 

DO YOU GET IT NOW?
MAKE NO CONCESSIONS FOR FREEDOM!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

16 Days And Let’s Tax the Poor

It took only 16 days for President Obama to break his campaign promise not to raise taxes on the poor. When President Obama signed the SCHIP bill, increasing the excise tax on Tobacco products by 156%, he raise taxes on 55% of smokers who are the “working poor” and the 25% of smokers who live below the poverty line. This bill is to provide health care to many of these smokers’ children. If he cared about the health of these children, the purpose of the cigarette tax would be to deter smoking because many children from homes of smokers require expensive medical care for respiratory symptoms. How is President Obama going to pay for a program when the source for funding the program will dwindle by design? How many days till President Obama breaks another campaign promise?

http://www.atr.org/content/pdf/2009/feb/020409pr-obama_breaks_campaign_tax_promise.pdf

My understaning of the SCHIP is that if the states accept money from this SCHIP fund they will only be funded for the first year. After that the state must carry the burden of this bill. Yet the government will keep the .61 per pack tax increase.

Our illustrious Govenor Perdue wants to add an additional $1.00 per pack tax increase on top of Obumnuts .61 tax. Many more states will follow to offset the cost of this descriminatory legislation.

Now to most states this is a non-issue. But here in NC tobacco built this state and has contributed heavily to health care, built hospitals, funded others, not to mention funding of schools, the arts, revitalizatin projects, just about anything you can think of R.J. Reynolds has funded in this state. And now Ms. Perdue wants to put them out of business, not to mention all the small tobacco farmers who make heir living growing burley. How stupid can a politician be?

SCHIP = destroying business, increasing unemployment, creating poverty.
 
TerryCSA, co-editor
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »