As liberals go around touting "We Won!", they act more like sore losers. The anger in their vile rhetoric directed towards conservatives is somewhat mystifying.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Now they can no longer play the victim of morality, since morality no longer exists.

I have been pondering their anger for some time now and it is starting to make sense... maybe. They are unruly teenagers who act out because they expect discipline. Now just think about this and follow along.

An unruly teenager breaks the rules when he knows there are consequences for his actions. He stays out past curfew, skips school, etc. He knows if he is caught, which he hopes he will be, that he will be punished. He expects to be punished. He needs to be punished. It is his way of reassuring himself that his parents care about what he does and his personal well-being. He knows someone cares about him. If he is not punished then he continues escalating his unruly behavior until someone cares enough about him to stop him. This fulfills a dual need. The need to feel love and the need to play the victim. He can play the victim in front of his peers because he was punished for bad behavior. Since his peers are like minded they can commiserate with him. Thus he gets a false sense of acceptance. In essence his bad behavior is awarded with unconditional love, acceptance, and victimization.

This scenario explains the Garofalo's of the world who spew vile hatred. There is nobody who cares enough about her to punish her. So her anger continues and the consequences of her actions are elusive. She receives acceptance from her peers but, she needs to be the victim. And without consequences and punishment she cannot fulfill the need for unconditional love nor can she play that one role she craves - victim. So her anger grows and her vile spews forth. 

Maybe they are angry because they "won". They know they have bad judgement and the safety net of someone stopping them from hurting themselves suddenly developed a large hole. Now they have no one to blame but themselves for what they have done. Yet their anger is deflected onto conservatives for not stopping them. They didn't really want to win. They wanted to be the victim and to blame the "racists" for their loss. They can't. They won.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Now they feel ashamed, humiliated. "Why isn't everyone coming to my party?" It's like the child that so wants to be liked by everybody, yet nobody shows up for her birthday party. And it's all Bush's fault. She is angry and lashes out at everyone around her because not everybody wants to be her friend. The libs are lashing out at the conservatives because we won't celebrate their victory. They don't understand this isn't the Academy Awards and Obozo isn't Denzel Washington.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Slowly their blinders are being removed and they see what a horrible mistake they made. They were duped and they are scared. Scared because they are responsible. Responsibility is not what liberals want. They don't understand the concept and can't handle it. Now they have to find someone to blame to deflect the blame from themselves.

It's Bush's fault.
It's Rush Limbaugh's fault.
It's the "racist" conservatives fault.
It's everybodies fault but their own.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Now they have nothing to protest. The conservatives are having "Tea Party's" and since it wasn't their idea they are not going to attend. The libs want to be the center of attention and we have stolen their thunder. They never expected us to take to the streets and upstage them. And once again we show them how childish and immature they are. We don't have need to smash windows, scream vulgarities at our opponents, or assault little old ladies to make our point. We are the adults and they are the children. Our objective doesn't require consequences and punishment. Yet, the liberals don't understand that. Our objective doesn't require unconditional love, acceptance, and victimization. Yet, the liberals do not understand that. It befuddles their mind that anyone would peaceably express their views in order to sway public opinon. That's just not how it is done in their liberal minds. So they must attack.

Their mindset is attack-react. In their mind when they are attacked, they react violently. They expect the same from conservatives. Afterall, we are just uneducated, bible clinging, gun toting, racist goobers who meet in the woods. How difficult should it be to get a reaction from such neanderthal types. It is irrational to them that someone of such low standing could exhibit such control, such poise, such maturity. So they continue with their vile denigration of what they know not.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Because they have underestimated the power that is not theirs - the conservative voice. They have awakened the slumbering giant and they have no defenses against him. The Hounds of Hell (liberals) will be squashed beneath his mighty fist. This is what the liberals want. To be punished so they may go back to playing the victim. The role they cherish so much.

 - TerryCSA

"The majority of those who are loosely identified by the term “liberals” are afraid to let themselves discover that what they advocate is statism. They do not want to accept the full meaning of their goal; they want to keep all the advantages and effects of capitalism, while destroying the cause, and they want to establish statism without its necessary effects. They do not want to know or to admit that they are the champions of dictatorship and slavery". - Ayn Rand

A Letter from an English Woman

 Now let me get this straight: You hired a man with virtually no experience, and mysterious past who might not even be a natural born citizen to be your president... and who derives all his experience from the seat of all corruption.. Chicago. His first act was try to give a trillion of your dollars to Wall Street crooks with absolutely no accountability and he is still trying mightily.. The people who already got your money were caught trying to buy a jet plane bought outside your country. The parties who have received your money and spent it are already legend. We think that within six months the next monies will be partied out and they will be back for more!

 His nominee for Sec of the Treasury is a tax evader. He was confirmed nevertheless. The next three whom he nominated were all tax evaders. Two of them had to withdraw on the same day. Your President promised that absolutely no lobbyists would be part of his administration. Already three of the biggest lobbyists in the country are on his team. Who fed you Americans a whopping dose of stupid? We grieve for the loss of your Constitution, common sense, and morality. I doubt if the Crown would take you back.

Greta Marley
London SW1

A Declaration of the People of the United States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of the Citizens of the United States; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to remove from office those who have systematically violated the Laws of the Land and restore their former Systems of Government. The history of the present United States Federal Government is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

The Federal Government has failed to Incorporate against the Fifty States the entire Bill of Rights and other Natural Rights.

The Federal Government has ceded the sovereignty of the United States and it's rule of law, specifically, the Constitution, to a world authority comprised largely of Nations whose legal doctrines run contrary to those of the United States.

The Federal Government has usurped authority not granted to the Federal Government by the Constitution to engage in unwarranted spending and onerous taxation for the purpose of expanding the size and scope of the Government and increasing its power over the People.

Branches of the Federal Government have illegally ceded authority to another branch of government, and Branches have accepted that authority thus dispensing with the inherent system of checks and balances.

The Federal Government has refused to enforce the Supreme Law of the Land in spite of the overwhelming demands of the Populace to do so.

The Federal Government has failed, on the part of elected officials, to uphold their Sacred Oaths to Preserve, Protect and Defend the Constitution of the United States.

The Federal Government has deliberately and systematically made efforts to devalue the currency of the United States of America against the wishes of the overwhelming majority of the Populace.

The Federal Government has deliberately abrogated treaties with other Sovereign Nations.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Representative Government, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

And as a free people who cherish the rule of law and the Liberty that affords, We the People require the following:

That the Concept of Sovereign Immunity is invalid. The People must be able to hold those who have chosen to serve the People, whether elected or appointed, accountable in a Court of Law.

That no Legislation may be passed without Sponsors citing Article, Section and Clause of the Constitution in order to establish its Constitutional validity.

That all Rights acknowledged in the Bill of Rights and other Rights are immutable and thus cannot be superceded by any Legislation, for we understand that a Right that can be taken away or curtailed is not a Right but a Privilege.

That no Branch of government has the Constitutional authority to cede any of its Powers to either of the other branches for any reason, nor does any Branch have the authority to accept power offered by either of the other two branches..

That all existing Federal Laws be reviewed by the Judiciary for the purpose of repealing all laws which cannot be defended Constitutionally.

That all obligations and tasks defined by the Constitution for the various branches of the Federal Government must be met, and that these obligations specifically enumerated therein comprise the sum total of tasks in which the Federal Government may engage.

That the currency of the United States of America be backed by tangible assets in the way of commodities with intrinsic value, that the system of fiat currency be immediately eliminated, and that only the Treasury, as so ordered and authorized by Congress, mint or print currency for or issue credit on behalf of the United States of America.

But first I want to thank all my comrades who sat on their arses watching Dancing With The Stars and drinking their beer instead of getting up off their sorry behinds and taking a few minutes to vote.

I want to thank the former Republican Party for straying from their core conservative values and recruiting moderates and RINOs into the party who thought it more important to reach across the aisle than to stand up for the American people, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, The Declaration of Independence, and freedom. Thank you for sitting up there collecting your paychecks while letting the socialist liberals take over and destroy all that we held dear.

Now comrades let's study the meanings of Socialism - Marxism - Communism

so·cial·ism 
  
Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.
The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.

Socialism

 A theory or system of social reform which contemplates a complete reconstruction of society, with a more just and equitable distribution of property and labor. In popular usage, the term is often employed to indicate any lawless, revolutionary social scheme. See Communism, Fourierism, Saint-Simonianism, forms of socialism.

[Socialism] was first applied in England to Owen's theory of social reconstruction, and in France to those also of St. Simon and Fourier . . . The word, however, is used with a great variety of meaning, . . . even by economists and learned critics. The general tendency is to regard as socialistic any interference undertaken by society on behalf of the poor, . . . radical social reform which disturbs the present system of private property . . . The tendency of the present socialism is more and more to ally itself with the most advanced democracy. --Encyc. Brit.

socialism

It took only 16 days for President Obama to break his campaign promise not to raise taxes on the poor. When President Obama signed the SCHIP bill, increasing the excise tax on Tobacco products by 156%, he raise taxes on 55% of smokers who are the “working poor” and the 25% of smokers who live below the poverty line. This bill is to provide health care to many of these smokers’ children. If he cared about the health of these children, the purpose of the cigarette tax would be to deter smoking because many children from homes of smokers require expensive medical care for respiratory symptoms. How is President Obama going to pay for a program when the source for funding the program will dwindle by design? How many days till President Obama breaks another campaign promise?

http://www.atr.org/content/pdf/2009/feb/020409pr-obama_breaks_campaign_tax_promise.pdf

My understaning of the SCHIP is that if the states accept money from this SCHIP fund they will only be funded for the first year. After that the state must carry the burden of this bill. Yet the government will keep the .61 per pack tax increase.

Our illustrious Govenor Perdue wants to add an additional $1.00 per pack tax increase on top of Obumnuts .61 tax. Many more states will follow to offset the cost of this descriminatory legislation.

Now to most states this is a non-issue. But here in NC tobacco built this state and has contributed heavily to health care, built hospitals, funded others, not to mention funding of schools, the arts, revitalizatin projects, just about anything you can think of R.J. Reynolds has funded in this state. And now Ms. Perdue wants to put them out of business, not to mention all the small tobacco farmers who make heir living growing burley. How stupid can a politician be?

ACORN Getting ‘Political Payoff’-- WAKE UP GOP!!

Our representatives need to be screaming from the roof tops.