As liberals go around touting "We Won!", they act more like sore losers. The anger in their vile rhetoric directed towards conservatives is somewhat mystifying.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Now they can no longer play the victim of morality, since morality no longer exists.

I have been pondering their anger for some time now and it is starting to make sense... maybe. They are unruly teenagers who act out because they expect discipline. Now just think about this and follow along.

An unruly teenager breaks the rules when he knows there are consequences for his actions. He stays out past curfew, skips school, etc. He knows if he is caught, which he hopes he will be, that he will be punished. He expects to be punished. He needs to be punished. It is his way of reassuring himself that his parents care about what he does and his personal well-being. He knows someone cares about him. If he is not punished then he continues escalating his unruly behavior until someone cares enough about him to stop him. This fulfills a dual need. The need to feel love and the need to play the victim. He can play the victim in front of his peers because he was punished for bad behavior. Since his peers are like minded they can commiserate with him. Thus he gets a false sense of acceptance. In essence his bad behavior is awarded with unconditional love, acceptance, and victimization.

This scenario explains the Garofalo's of the world who spew vile hatred. There is nobody who cares enough about her to punish her. So her anger continues and the consequences of her actions are elusive. She receives acceptance from her peers but, she needs to be the victim. And without consequences and punishment she cannot fulfill the need for unconditional love nor can she play that one role she craves - victim. So her anger grows and her vile spews forth. 

Maybe they are angry because they "won". They know they have bad judgement and the safety net of someone stopping them from hurting themselves suddenly developed a large hole. Now they have no one to blame but themselves for what they have done. Yet their anger is deflected onto conservatives for not stopping them. They didn't really want to win. They wanted to be the victim and to blame the "racists" for their loss. They can't. They won.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Now they feel ashamed, humiliated. "Why isn't everyone coming to my party?" It's like the child that so wants to be liked by everybody, yet nobody shows up for her birthday party. And it's all Bush's fault. She is angry and lashes out at everyone around her because not everybody wants to be her friend. The libs are lashing out at the conservatives because we won't celebrate their victory. They don't understand this isn't the Academy Awards and Obozo isn't Denzel Washington.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Slowly their blinders are being removed and they see what a horrible mistake they made. They were duped and they are scared. Scared because they are responsible. Responsibility is not what liberals want. They don't understand the concept and can't handle it. Now they have to find someone to blame to deflect the blame from themselves.

It's Bush's fault.
It's Rush Limbaugh's fault.
It's the "racist" conservatives fault.
It's everybodies fault but their own.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Now they have nothing to protest. The conservatives are having "Tea Party's" and since it wasn't their idea they are not going to attend. The libs want to be the center of attention and we have stolen their thunder. They never expected us to take to the streets and upstage them. And once again we show them how childish and immature they are. We don't have need to smash windows, scream vulgarities at our opponents, or assault little old ladies to make our point. We are the adults and they are the children. Our objective doesn't require consequences and punishment. Yet, the liberals don't understand that. Our objective doesn't require unconditional love, acceptance, and victimization. Yet, the liberals do not understand that. It befuddles their mind that anyone would peaceably express their views in order to sway public opinon. That's just not how it is done in their liberal minds. So they must attack.

Their mindset is attack-react. In their mind when they are attacked, they react violently. They expect the same from conservatives. Afterall, we are just uneducated, bible clinging, gun toting, racist goobers who meet in the woods. How difficult should it be to get a reaction from such neanderthal types. It is irrational to them that someone of such low standing could exhibit such control, such poise, such maturity. So they continue with their vile denigration of what they know not.

Maybe they are angry because they "won". Because they have underestimated the power that is not theirs - the conservative voice. They have awakened the slumbering giant and they have no defenses against him. The Hounds of Hell (liberals) will be squashed beneath his mighty fist. This is what the liberals want. To be punished so they may go back to playing the victim. The role they cherish so much.

 - TerryCSA

"The majority of those who are loosely identified by the term “liberals” are afraid to let themselves discover that what they advocate is statism. They do not want to accept the full meaning of their goal; they want to keep all the advantages and effects of capitalism, while destroying the cause, and they want to establish statism without its necessary effects. They do not want to know or to admit that they are the champions of dictatorship and slavery". - Ayn Rand